Evangelicals are starting to acknowledge the harm they’ve done to the LGBT community.
For example, at this year’s Q conference in Boston, Gabe Lyons told those gathered that the church ought to repent for how it’s treated gays and lesbians. Then he went a step further, offering a public apology to Andrew Sullivan (in response to the above quote).
Megachurch pastor David Whiting began a recent sermon on homosexuality apologizing for the “hatred, anger, dislike, and disdain” churches have shown to gay people. With visible remorse, he acknowledged that “Christians have gotten a reputation for being homophobic because many Christians are homophobic.”
Reflecting on the Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage, Christianity Today editor Mark Galli called on evangelicals to repent of homophobia, fear, and prejudice.
Atlanta pastor Dewey Smith took heat for a recent sermon in which he compared the dehumanization of gays to the experience of blacks at the height of the slave trade. “We have done what the slave master did to us,” he told his parishioners.
What we’re seeing is more than just a “few bad apples” in the church. People are starting to realize this is more than just the sin of those who wave homophobic signs at funerals. The church’s woeful track record belongs to otherwise respectable evangelicals, not just the fundamentalist fringe.
Each person mentioned above maintains a traditional view of marriage. Each believes Scripture unequivocally prohibits same-sex intimacy.
With each apology or acknowledgement of wrongdoing, they went on to reaffirm their traditional beliefs, almost as if to say, “Please don’t judge our theology by our actions.”
Which should lead us to ask…
At what point does a widely acknowledged pattern of unloving behavior indicate something more than just the faulty application of your beliefs?
At what point is it no longer possible to separate a particular set of beliefs from its fruit?
What if our catastrophically misguided treatment of gays points to a deeper issue?
If your theology leads to behavior that is unloving or unkind, chances are there’s a problem with your theology.
Belief informs behavior. Your actions are shaped in part by your theology.
In which case, the ultimate test of any rule or doctrine is not, “Does it cohere intellectually?” but, “Does it encourage me to be more loving to others?”
If “love is the fulfillment of the law,” then any law which does not lead us to be more loving is not worth fulfilling.
For ages, Christians argued slavery was OK. They had Scripture on their side. They had history on their side. The inhumane treatment of blacks was proof enough they were wrong.
For ages, Christians argued women were inferior. They had Scripture on their side. They had history on their side. The degrading, humiliating treatment of women was proof enough they were wrong.
In both cases, a lack of love exposed a faulty belief system.
In the present debate over sexual ethics, it might matter less which side can line up the most proof texts or which side can make the best appeal to history. It might matter more which side proves itself to be the most loving, the most compassionate, and the most hospitable.
As Peter Enns wrote recently:
The best apologetic isn’t having a better intellectual system. The best apologetic is… how Christians live positively toward others. What difference this “belief system” makes in our global community.
We are the apologetic.
If you affirm the traditional view but lament the church’s treatment of gays and lesbians, you can resolve to be more loving. That in itself would be a good and holy thing.
But maybe we should go one step further and ask if there’s a connection between our convictions and the way we treat others—and then resolve to bring both into alignment with the Great Commandment.
Photo by Sancho McCann on Flickr (text added to original image) / CC BY 2.0
11 thoughts on “Why you may want to check your beliefs”
I recently read somewhere a statement that might be appropriate to this post, Ben: “The cleverist way to avoid Jesus is to hide behind a Bible.” Or, as you said above, “If your theology leads to behavior that is unloving or unkind, chances are there’s a problem with your theology.” Good post! Thx!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice quote…thanks for sharing!
Great minds think alike ! Well thought out , well presented, and well received. 🙂 Walter. ( Australia)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well done, but I have a suggestion. Your language and quotes are, in some respects, “preaching to the choir”, or at least “preaching to the informed”. How many run-of-the-mill, non-pastoring congregants understand what an “apologetic” is, for example? Without more education, or simpler language, the audience that needs most to hear this is not going to understand some of it. I hate to “dumb down” important things, but choosing a commonly-understood vocabulary to discuss issues is also important. Since written language is less precise than face-to-face communication, let me be clear: this is a suggestion for improvement for expanded accessibility _to_ the content, not a criticism _of_ the content.
Reblogged this on franiel32.
Spiritual abuse can development into PTSD. When counseling persons with PTSD, it is quite common to see a LOT of cognitive dissonance. When behavior and beliefs do not line up, this results in all manner of collateral damage. It is time to heal for everyone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PTSD has left me with a hole in my sole….. When we have a decayed tooth, with a hole in it we go off to the dentist and he or she takes care of it, and fills it, to prevent further decay. When we have a decay in our hearts, similar to the dental decay, the hole, where can we go to fill it ? Who takes care of the decay and restores our souls?
Reblogged this on FAITH AUTOPSY and commented:
This is a great post from Ben Irwin… Worth reading through…
LikeLiked by 1 person
When my son was killed in a car accident my theology changed to the following statement: We are born into this world with a relationship with our parents. When we die all we have to take with us is the relationships we made while we were alive, and nothing more.
I believe it lines up with your post.
Reblogged this on Russ Skinner's Blog and commented:
Daunting words from a challenging post: “the ultimate test of any rule or doctrine is not, ‘Does it cohere intellectually?’ but, ‘Does it encourage me to be more loving to others?'”
Good stuff…as always.